for recently burst out of Johnson products sold in the market there are harmful substances, a company recently responded, although attached to the same products in different parts of the world of a component or a different, but all are in compliance with international safety standards and requirements of the regulation.
so-called meet safety standards for infant use? What standards can do unscrupulous consumer health laboratory to consumers in particular baby consumers j toxic history is not far away. Back in 2005, India found to contain liquid paraffin Johnson baby products harmful to babies, India experts made it clear that mineral oil is not suitable for use by infants.
the official website of the safe cosmetics campaign in published reports of the baby bathtubs are still toxic. Reported that in the United States, China, Australia, and Canada and Indonesia sold in the market of 5 Johnson baby shampoo containing quaternary ammonium salts in 15 substances, and the United Kingdom, and Japan, and Denmark, and Finland, and Sweden, and Norway and the Netherlands and South Africa 8 release of formaldehyde from sale Johnson baby shampoo does not contain preservatives. The institutions from 13 countries from July to October this year to buy Johnson baby shampoo, detection components listed on the product label. 15 is a quaternary ammonium salt by releasing a preservative formaldehyde sterilization. United States health and . human services and the United Nations International Agency for research on formaldehyde is classified as a known human carcinogen, World Health Organization, the United States National Cancer Institute and the United States National Toxicology authority found that exposure to formaldehyde may cause leukemia associated with it.
some consumers expressed indignation about Johnson these double standards, considered to be discrimination against Chinese consumers. Although Johnson claimed that their products meet the safety standards, but many parents don’t buy it. Consumers say: containing toxic substances not comfortable with people, who want to take their children to do the experiment? Some parents think that, even if the product in the quaternary ammonium salt content of 15 rare enough to be harmful to babies, but after all, products not containing quaternary ammonium salt 15 more secure. J in the United Kingdom, and Japan and other countries selling products not containing quaternary ammonium salt 15, why not all countries alike? China baby can only use low standard product?
j as an internationally renowned companies, detected toxic baby products to break out of its advertised by the love of advertisements do not match, consumers will naturally not suitable for infants using baby products go away!
response: State food and Drug Administration for j products for security risk assessment
Xinhua Beijing November 4 4th reporters learned from the State food and drug administration, in view of the current aroused public concern Johnson baby shampoo was suspected of containing toxic substances problems of quaternary ammonium salt-15, State food and Drug Administration cosmetics 3rd Organization Committee of experts on safety in cosmetic use of quaternary ammonium salt-15 to discuss other related issues, and related monitoring and assessment of security risks.
no comment untill now